Defamation

Being Sued for Defamation? Understand Your Legal Defences Now.

Being on the receiving end of a defamation claim is serious — but Australian law provides a range of robust defences including truth, honest opinion, qualified privilege, and public interest. Get specialist legal advice before you respond to any claim or demands letter.

Free consultation Defamation defence specialists No upfront fees

⚠ The offer to make amends process has strict timelines — get legal advice before the window closes — submit your request now.

Does This Sound Like You?

Common situations we help with.

Received a concerns notice or letter of demand

You've been served with a formal concerns notice under the Defamation Acts or a lawyer's letter demanding a retraction and compensation. You need legal advice quickly — the response period is usually 28 days and how you respond can significantly affect the outcome and your costs exposure.

Published a negative review being sued over

You wrote an honest negative review of a product, service, or business based on your genuine experience, and the business has threatened defamation proceedings. The honest opinion defence (formerly comment defence) may protect you, but you need legal advice to understand whether it applies and how to respond.

Shared a news article now the subject of a claim

You shared or reposted a published news article or social media post and are now being included in a defamation claim. Republication of defamatory material can give rise to liability, even if you were not the original author. A lawyer can advise on whether you have a defence and how best to respond to the claim.

Reported a genuine concern about a business or person

You reported concerns about a business, professional, or individual to a regulatory body, employer, or other relevant authority and now face a defamation claim. Qualified privilege may protect statements made to appropriate recipients in genuine response to a duty or interest. A lawyer can assess whether the protection applies to your circumstances.

Statement made in a protected context

Your statement was made in proceedings before a court, tribunal, parliamentary committee, or in a publication expressly authorised by a court or parliament. Absolute privilege protects such statements from defamation claims entirely, regardless of whether the content is true or false. A lawyer can confirm whether your specific context attracts absolute privilege.

Journalist defending a factual story

You're a journalist or media organisation facing a defamation claim over a story you believe to be accurate and published responsibly in the public interest. The 2021 reforms introduced a "publication on matter of public interest" defence. A lawyer can advise on how to structure the defence and what evidence to gather to support it.

Get Your Situation Assessed — Free

How It Works

Defamation defence matched to your situation in 3 steps.

We connect you with defamation defence lawyers who understand the full range of defences under Australian law. Don't respond to a defamation claim without proper legal advice — the stakes are significant.

Submit Your Defamation Defence Request
1

Submit your request

Tell us what was published, what the claimant is alleging, whether you have received a concerns notice or court papers, and your state.

2

Get matched to a specialist

We connect you with a defamation defence lawyer who can assess your exposure and identify the available defences for your situation.

3

Free consultation

Your lawyer contacts you to explain your defences and options — including the offer to make amends process — at no initial cost.

28 Days

The response period after receiving a concerns notice — legal advice within this window is critical

All 8 States

Requests matched to specialist lawyers across every state and territory in Australia

Free

Initial consultation — understand your rights and options before committing to any action

Strong Defences

Truth, honest opinion, qualified privilege, and public interest are all robust defences under Australian defamation law

Before You Respond

Practical questions about defamation defences in Australia.

What are the main defences to defamation in Australia? +

The main defences to defamation under Australian uniform defamation legislation include: justification (truth) — the matter is substantially true; honest opinion — the matter was an expression of opinion based on proper material; qualified privilege — the matter was published to a person with a duty or interest to receive it; absolute privilege — for statements in court, parliamentary, or other protected proceedings; and the public interest defence introduced by the 2021 reforms — the matter related to a matter of public interest and the defendant reasonably believed publication was in the public interest. The defendant bears the burden of proving a defence once the plaintiff establishes the basic elements of defamation.

How is truth proved in a defamation defence? +

The truth (justification) defence requires the defendant to prove that the defamatory imputation conveyed by the publication was substantially true — meaning true in all material respects. This is a matter of civil proof (balance of probabilities), not criminal proof. Evidence to support a truth defence can include documents, records, witness statements, prior court findings, and expert evidence. The key challenge is that the defendant must prove the truth of the imputation as it would have been understood by readers — not merely the literal words used. Gathering compelling evidence early is critical to the strength of a truth defence.

When does qualified privilege apply to complaints about public officials? +

Qualified privilege applies where the defendant had a duty (legal, social, or moral) or interest in making the statement, and the recipient had a corresponding duty or interest in receiving it. Complaints about public officials, healthcare providers, or regulated professionals made to an appropriate body — such as a government department, regulator, or employer — are commonly protected by qualified privilege. However, the protection is "qualified" — it can be defeated if the plaintiff proves the defendant was actuated by malice (an improper motive). A lawyer can advise on whether your specific communication to the specific recipient is likely to attract qualified privilege.

What is the honest opinion defence in Australian defamation law? +

The honest opinion defence (previously known as the "comment" or "fair comment" defence) protects the expression of a genuine opinion on a matter of public interest where the opinion is based on proper material (that is, facts or other material that are substantially true, privileged, or otherwise protected). The opinion must be clearly recognisable as opinion rather than a statement of fact. The defence can be defeated if the plaintiff proves the opinion was not genuinely held. For consumers reviewing products or services or commentators writing about public matters, this defence is often available — but it requires the opinion to be distinguishable from factual assertion.

How should I respond to a concerns notice? +

A concerns notice formally initiates the pre-litigation process under the Defamation Acts. Upon receiving a concerns notice, you have 28 days to make an offer to make amends — a formal offer that can include a correction, apology, and/or compensation. Making a proper offer to make amends and having it rejected by the plaintiff is a complete defence to the defamation claim in most states. If you intend to defend the claim, you should not respond without legal advice, as how you respond (and whether you make admissions) can significantly affect the outcome and any costs orders made against you.

What is the Section 15 offer to make amends process? +

Section 15 of the uniform Defamation Acts (equivalent provisions in each state) allows a publisher to make a formal offer to make amends to resolve a defamation dispute before it goes to trial. The offer can include a correction, an apology, the removal of the content, and/or payment of compensation and costs. An offer to make amends must be made within 28 days of receiving a concerns notice (or within a longer period if agreed). If the offer is a "reasonable offer" and the plaintiff unreasonably rejects it, this is a complete defence to the claim. The process is designed to encourage early resolution and a properly structured offer can significantly limit a defendant's legal exposure.

Have a question not covered here? Submit your request and a lawyer will be in touch.

Request a Free Consultation

Ready to Take the First Step?

Submit your request and a legal representative will be in touch to discuss your matter.

Submit Your Legal Request

More Defamation Topics

View all →